Budgeting issues in criminal justice systems Essay Example for Free

Budgeting issues in criminal justice arrangements EssayOne of the reasons why jails still exist despite overcrowding is the cipher allotted for the criminal justice administration. But the sudden rise in the upshot of prisoners posed a problem when it comes to budgeting. The expression on policies and procedures of correctional facilities ope ordinated by the Multnomah County clearly shows that it has been experiencing monetary shortage due to faulty budgeting. The article shows that it is very dearly-won to accommodate a prisoner, which costs $157/day in Multnomah County. This is expensive compargond to the rate of jail systems in other counties.This was attributed to the labor contracts which resulted to raised labor costs, extraordinarily high medical costs which led to high cost of the overall system in jail, in in effect(p) jail staffing pattern, abuse of sick leave, overtime and compensatory time and increase in the Sheriffs budget. Aside from all of these, the Multn omah County has a very expensive juvenile detention facility. It costs $401/day to accommodate a juvenile. The article further shows that the Sheriffs Office has practiced budgeting techniques which hid the management practices of the organization.This resulted to difficulty of finding appear the different organization functions. Even the district attorneys office has to seek the help of a pecuniary analyst to make sense of the monetary discloseline of the jail system. What the county requires is a program called priority-based budgeting. Each de crack upment of the jail system must(prenominal) present program offers for the county commissioners to fund. However, some of these program offers are rejected. The Sheriffs office has a total of 66 funding program offers that the county commission has approved.The priority-based budgeting was applied so that the commissioners can make an informed decision from an accurate financial picture of the different programs. This enabled the commissioners to be knowledgeable in whether funding or rejecting a particular program. The article concluded that the outside help of a financial consultant was necessary to analyze the Sheriffs costs and budgets. It was noted that it is a natural and actualiseable inclination of a government agency to do the budgeting practices discussed in the article.The DAs office thought that similar practices have been done by other government agencies in the county. It was suggested that the commission should collaborate much with the Sheriff. The county commissioners should understand the operations that they fund so that the problems might not occur again. The workgroup of the jail systems should focus on the Sheriffs cost reporting and budgeting practices so that they can touch on in any decisions to make. The commission should also found a work group that will inspect the jails and report frequently to the commissioners.This work group must consist of representatives from the law enf orcement agencies in the county, the County Chair, the County Commissioner, the United States Attorney, the administrator for the federal facility at Sheridan, representatives from the business community, a representative from the medical community, the Department of corrections, an independent financial analyst and the District Attorney. The law also requires that the county should include the state Department of Corrections in every operation of the local jails.However, whatever responsibilities the Department of Corrections is assigned by the law should not be carried out by the Sheriffs Association. The article strongly advises that a healthy relationship must be established between the county Sheriff and the Board of Commissioners. Any solution to the problems must start from this perspective since all other problems stemmed from a breakdown to that relationship. The other article addressing budgeting issue is titled Will part-time prison land crime or costs? by Nick Morriso n.The article says that British Home secretarial assistant David Blunkett proposed that some inmates be given freedom on weekends to relieve the growing population of prisoners in jails. Those inmates who are dangerous could be provided with electronic tags and they could stay out of jail for a month. They could also work during the week and choke the weekend in jail. Many questioned this proposal whether it is a way to fight the crimes or to cut costs, particularly Norman Brennan, director of the Victims of Crime Trust.He sees this proposal as the governments admission to defeat in solving crimes, even though Blunkett promised to be tough on car-jackers and phone thieves. Brennan thinks that it has to do with money problems and not reducing crime why Blunkett allowed this kind of arrangement for the prisoners. It was hard for the government to spend a lot of money in keeping prisoners. Moreover, Brennan argued that it is more important to keep the prisoners in jails and out of th e streets to protect the victims of crimes and the public, even though it is expensive to do so. Apparently, Blunketts proposal did not make this possible.Criminals were allowed on the loose, and they could strike again since they have freedom. With the growing population of prisoners in jails, Brennan says that the criminal justice system is no longer effective. A crisis in the criminal justice system has to appear before peck do something to answer it. He recognizes that the problems will be harder to solve later on. Even more, there were less police officers on the beat to prevent crimes even though these crimes have been getting worse for many years now. The government also has not done something to shorten crime.He couldnt see how Blunketts proposal could solve any of the problems. Brennan mentions that the country has more people inside prisons than any countries in Europe. He says it is so because there are more crimes here than anywhere else. The government, he adds, has resorted to different measures to solve the rising number of crimes. Sadly, none of these measures worked, and this showed a disgraceful record on crime and law and order. On the other hand, the Howard League for Penal Reform agreed with Blunketts proposal. The spokeswoman says that anything to reduce the prison population is a good thing. She added that the programs set to keep the prisoners with a two or three months term away from their criminal behavior are not often available, thats why they offend the second time after they are released. The article recommends that a community penalty is more effective as a form of punishment for the prisoners than sending them over to prison. The article quotes Brennan recommending that the government should deal with the crimes head on rather than making lots of promises and pledges that it cannot meet. slew should also be aware of these problems and how serious they are so that they can be a part in solving them.Brennan is correct in ap othegm that criminals should be sent to prison whether it is expensive or not. The most important thing to consider here is the protection of the public from these offenders. The government should look more into these problems because this is getting worse every year and it has bad records of crime. The government should also look into the budgeting systems of the federal and local governments. It should consider that budgeting systems can be a part of the ineffective services it offers to the public. Changes in budgeting systems should be an important part in reform.REFERENCESMorrison, Nick. (2002, February 05). Will part-time prison cut crime or costs? Newsquest (North easterly Ltd. , p. 8. functional at http//yukon. actx. edu2083/libweb/curriculum/do/document? set=topicgroupid=1requestid=conquesttopicresultid=48ts=57673F035D3E975120F685A75E3514BA_1187860483640urn=urn%3Abigchalk%3AUS%3BBCLib%3Bdocument%3B76740234. The Multnomah County District Attorneys Office. (2006). Independe nt review of policies and procedures of correctional facilities operated by the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office. Available at http//www. mcda. us/articles/GJ_CORRECTIONAL_FACILITIES_2006. pdf.